Report comment

Time limits for complaint were disregarded in 2011. A "crank" complained in 2006 and it was dismissed by the old system in 2008. he complained again in 2011. Leo accepted it. I was informed by the legal adviser to the Law Society " oh yes, they have mission creep".he said with disinterest. Nor did a council member find it of any importance that Leo restored a dismissed matter 5+ years after. They ordered a "fine" of £400 in 2011 for something alleged to have occurred in 2006 but the crank was so offended he accused Leo of all sorts of things. Would the Law Society act similarly today now we have this form of communication? The papers were shown to the Law Society. The LS gave LeO a free hand to disregard limitation.