Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

This appears to be a fact specific decision - the weed was growing well before 2004 by which time the damage/loss had already occurred - but it will no doubt be used be defendants (and their insurers) to claim a general point of principle and say Japanese knotweed encroachment can never be the subject of a damages claim.

Your details

Cancel