Society warns LSB against diversity surveys
The Law Society has joined a wave of criticism of the Legal Services Board (LSB) by repeating its opposition to the publication of the results of mandatory diversity surveys of firms.
In its response to the LSB’s draft business plan for 2013-14, the Society accuses the board of ‘usurping the role of the approved regulators’ and adding to the regulatory burden through its costs to the profession.
The business plan has also come under fire from the Bar Council and the Solicitors Regulation Authority, which said ‘it is not clear that the organisation as a whole has sufficient knowledge or experience of the regulation of professions and conduct of business regulation’.
In its comments, published yesterday, the Society calls for a ‘frank dialogue’ between the LSB, regulators and the profession and has said that current work to make the LSB a licensing authority should ‘be dropped’.
It also reminds the LSB that its role is not to drive regulatory change, but to ensure that the regulators are doing their job of ‘protecting consumers and monitoring the integrity of the profession’.
While supporting the LSB’s objectives on equality and diversity, the Society says that imposing a ‘regulatory obligation’ on firms to conduct surveys about the diversity of their workforce and then publish the results will deter employees in smaller firms from providing the information.
It says that the SRA is already carrying out important work on equality and diversity ‘and it is not clear to us that further work is needed by the LSB now’.
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination