SDT slammed by black lawyers
The Society of Black Lawyers has called for ‘wholesale reform’ of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, alleging that its decisions are biased against black and minority ethnic solicitors.
In a letter to master of the rolls Lord Neuberger, the society’s chair Peter Herbert (pictured) said: ‘We believe that several cases exist which demonstrate a clear lack of independence, impartiality and transparency at the SDT.’
Under the Solicitors Act 1974 the master of the rolls is responsible for appointing members of the tribunal.
The SBL is seeking reform of the tribunal and an urgent review of all its decisions. Herbert told the Gazette he wanted a definitive sanctions guide to be adopted by the SDT within the next six months and comprehensive academic research conducted into its sentencing practices to test for differential treatment. He also wants to see thorough diversity training and monitoring, and an open and transparent appointments system with appointees reflecting the diversity of those who appear before the tribunal.
As currently constituted, the SDT is ‘not fit for purpose’ and ‘falls far behind the quality and consistency of other regulatory tribunals’, he alleged.
The call for reform comes in the wake of the publication of the SBL’s report into allegations of discrimination at the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and its demand for a fresh enquiry into the SRA’s procedures and performance.
An SDT spokesman said: ‘The SDT deals solely with cases presented to it by the SRA and lay applicants. The tribunal is an independent, impartial decision-making body. If any party is unhappy with a decision of the tribunal it is, of course, open to them to appeal to the High Court.’
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination