LSB launches investigation to consider regulation of will-writing and probate
The Legal Services Board is to launch a formal investigation that will consider regulation of will-writing, following a recommendation from its consumer watchdog.
The regulatory overseer stressed, however, that ‘a monopoly for solicitors is not the answer’.
In its second major piece of advisory work for the board, published today, the Legal Services Consumer Panel (LSCP) recommends that a relatively free market in will-writing services should remain.
However, it says that all providers, including solicitors, should be obliged to satisfy regulators that they are competent, follow a code of conduct and allow complaints to the Legal Ombudsman.
The starting point for a regulatory scheme could be the code of the Institute of Professional Willwriters, it suggests.
About half of all solicitors’ firms, some 5,300, provide will-writing services.
However, their market share has been declining in the face of growing competition from other providers such as banks, will-writing companies and online providers.
Estimates suggest that solicitors now prepare only two-thirds of all wills.
Unregulated will-writing companies prepare about 10%, amounting to 180,000 annually.
The LSB asked the panel to consider the longstanding issue of regulating will-writers last year, amid mounting concern about the impact of the present free-for-all on consumers.
Scotland moved to regulate will-writing companies in 2010, and earlier this year the Law Society launched a campaign calling on the government to make will- writing a reserved activity in England and Wales, to better protect consumers.
The panel’s report uncovered evidence of poor quality wills, sharp sales practices, and lost wills where companies disappear without trace.
Worryingly for solicitors, following a mystery-shopping exercise the same proportion of wills prepared by solicitors and will-writing companies (one in five) were ‘failed’ by the panel’s expert assessors.
LSCP chair Dianne Hayter said: ‘It is vital that advisers do a competent job, especially since any defects are unlikely to be discovered until it is too late.
‘The panel was shocked by the poor quality of wills in the mystery shopping.
'Although the sample was small [101 wills], will-writing companies and solicitors were equally culpable, pointing to the need for tighter controls across the sector.’
The report also calls for training standards for solicitors to be raised and for the Office of Fair Trading to lead an enforcement campaign targeted at the ‘minority’ of will-writing companies responsible for the worst sales practices.
The LSB considered the report at a meeting yesterday and last night announced a statutory investigation into how best to protect consumers in the will-writing, probate and estate administration markets.
This is the first time that the board has used its powers under the Legal Services Act 2007 to examine whether a specific activity should be added to the list of reserved activities - meaning those services which can only be provided by persons authorised by approved regulators.
LSB chairman David Edmonds said: ‘The board is grateful for the thorough analysis which has been produced by Baroness Hayter and her panel.
'On the basis of these findings, and the evidence we have seen, we agree that is a prima facie case to start a statutory investigation into regulation, not just of will-writing but also of estate administration and probate.
'This will be the first time that this process has been used and we will be consulting widely on responses to these findings, which clearly indicate consumer detriment across wills produced by different types of providers.
‘Importantly, solutions will need to be targeted at the actual problems - it is clear from the results of the mystery shopping exercise - and the Consumer Panel’s analysis - that the challenges are common to all providers and that a monopoly for solicitors is not the answer.
'We are asking the existing regulators and trade bodies to explore the steps that can be immediately taken to raise standards across the market place.’
Law Society chief executive Desmond Hudson said: ‘The Society has seen too many examples of dishonesty and bad practice from unregulated will-writers, and we have been campaigning for many years to have this addressed.
'We are delighted that the Consumer Panel has recognised the seriousness of these concerns.’
He added: ‘We strongly support steps to improve training in the market and will be looking ourselves at initiatives to provide support and encourage improved standards for solicitors.
'What is most important to remember, however, is that solicitors are required to be covered by insurance, are subject to a strong complaints and disciplinary process and a compensation fund exists to ensure that consumers using solicitors do not lose out.
'This means that there is real protection for consumers if, as will inevitably happen on occasion, solicitors make mistakes.
'Consumers who pay to have something as important as a will made out should benefit from these protections in all circumstances.’
- See Comment.


Comments
Will writing
I wonder if quangocrats will next go after surgeons. After all, why should only people with medical degrees have a monopoly on performing surgery?
Will Writing
Or structural engineers a monopoly on the design and construction of bridges, skyscrapers and nuclear power installations?
Or electricians on the installation of new wiring?
Or gas safe engineers on the installation/repair of heating systems?
However, look on the bright side. Many Solicitors who in the past provided will writing services will find a new career path in addressing dealing with the disputes arising from errors made by the incompetent.
Oh, hang about, I forgot - they will only be able to act for the rich, as legal aid won't be available.
Are you listening, Merrs Cameron, Clarke and Djanogly?
Or do you only listen when you believe you can make political capital out of a situation?
As for the LSCP , can anyone actually tell us what benefit it provides to anyone, and at what cost?
Brilliant! You could barely
Brilliant! You could barely make it up.
Lets free up the market, open it to all, and then find some regulation is needed.
Once upon a time, there already was a free market between providers of legal services. The providers did all sorts of legal work and they had a qualification too-they were called solicitors!
No favours
Solicitors have done themselves no favours. When I last had a Will drafted a couple of years ago I was confronted by a secretary (her own description) rudimentarily trained to draft Wills. Whilst the Will itself could have been checked by a more qualified member of the firm, the oral element of the instructions which went towards preparing it could not. If surgeons were to let poorly qualified para-medics undertake surgery for them, they could hardly then complain that the job had become deskilled.
Point missed?
Commentators seem to be missing the critical paragraph here. Solicitors still have a large share of the market and:
"Worryingly for solicitors, following a mystery-shopping exercise the same proportion of wills prepared by solicitors and will-writing companies (one in five) were ‘failed’ by the panel’s expert assessors."
There appears to be a general problem with the quality of will-writing, whether done by solicitors or other professionals. Richard Moorhead's blog is interesting on this:
http://lawyerwatch.wordpress.com/2011/07/14/will-writing-consumer-power-...
For me, the question of quality amongst professionals is one of the hugely interesting regulatory questions of the future - and one it is in the interest of lawyers to get out ahead of.
I am not a Will practitioner,
I am not a Will practitioner, I work in a different area of law, but I wonder if one of the main difficulties is that in order to compete on price with the less regulated outfits (that therefore cost less to run), the solicitor firms are delegating the actual Will preparation to less or unqualified staff who have only had a cursory training and then not spending any or enough time checking the drafts. As someone else has commented, if they don't elicit sufficiently thorough instructions in the first place through knowing what to ask the client (questionnaires only get you so far), then inevitably the Will will not be adequate and that is something the solicitor may be unable to pick up on when checking a draft. I know some firms who still charge a bit more for Wills as they insist on being thorough and having the instructions taken by the solicitor and the Will drafted by them. However, the number of Wills they do has dropped significantly. Fortunately, these firms are not especially small ones and have other departments (including commercial) which both subsidise and feed the Wills department. Without this support, however, it could well be that they would eventually go bust if they tried to continue offering quality at a greater price, as it seems that the vast majority of clients just don't want to pay for that. I saw someone on a free community advice clinic recently, asking about a Will and a Pre Nuptial agreement. It was clear the whole family were very wealthy, yet here this person was at the local community centre, where the slots are supposed to be 15 mins, pressing on and on asking questions until I had to steer the client to the door and the centre staff had to come in and make clear we were going over time! It's hardly the first time I've seen that type of person there, even though as solicitors we offer a free initial consultation. Also the client kept asking my why one couldn't just get the documents off the internet. People just don't want to pay for legal services these days, even though the cost of protection (say £700 for a Pre Nup) would potentially save a vastly greater sum if needed in the future. It appears to be a vicious circle. It's a strange one, though, really, as people do seem to accept in other industries that quality generally costs a bit more. Otherwise, I suppose we'd all buy our clothes from Primark instead of M&S and get our kitchens from Wickes instead of getting a joiner to make it.
Yes, that is precisely the
Yes, that is precisely the point. The client believes that a "will", "conveyance", or indeed any other legal service is exactly the same "product" no matter what the price of it.
They have, of course, been encouraged in this view by the ethos of professionalism, i.e. that they would get the same from all practitioners. This was fine in the era of set fees-the fee was fixed and the quality of the service therefore should be.
However, once a "market" was introduced, the client expected and was encouraged to expect the same level of service from all, but a variation in price. This was unrealistic in the extreme-one cannot buy a high quality product for the price of a lower quality product.
Clients then felt cheated when they did not get the Rolls Royce for a mini price, and solicitors felt hard done by in being expected to provide the best for the second best price.
Until the "consumer", and indeed the regulatory authorities grow up and understand what a market entails, there will continue to be problems. The referral fee debacle is all part of this-the consumer believes they are getting something free, when of course that fee is paid by them from the fee they pay the solicitor.
Qualifictaion for Will Writers
The issue is not regulation but the consumer’s unawareness of the potential complexities involved in writing a will and therefore the level of qualified professional they should seek for advice in this matter.
Currently the true specialists in this field are STEP (Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners) members, identified by TEP after their name. STEP have also recently launched a industry recognised exam for will writers providing a benchmark qualification in this area of law.
All solicitors and will writers, alike, should at least obtain this qualification before offering will writing services.