Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal decisions

Search SDT decisions


Decisions filed recently with the Law Society (which may be subject to appeal):

Monday, 20 May 2013
  • Application 11023-2012
  • Admitted 1979
  • Hearing 13 December 2012
  • Reasons 15 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.



Monday, 20 May 2013
  • Application 11039-2012
  • Admitted 1988
  • Hearing 17 January 2013
  • Reasons 5 February 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should pay a fine of £5,000.



Monday, 13 May 2013
  • Application 10958-2012
  • Hearing 11 February 2013
  • Reasons 27 March 2013

The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1999) should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for five years to commence on 11 February 2013.



Monday, 13 May 2013
  • Application 10767-2011
  • Hearing 11 June 2012
  • Reasons 27 July 2012

The SDT ordered that the allegations made against the first and fourth respondents should be adjourned and severed, but that the hearing of the allegations against the second respondent (admitted 2002) and the third respondent (admitted 1993) should proceed.



Monday, 13 May 2013
  • Application 11017-2012
  • Admitted 1988
  • Hearing 11 December 2012
  • Reasons 21 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.



Monday, 13 May 2013
  • Application 11021-2012
  • Admitted 1997
  • Hearing 19 December 2012
  • Reasons 14 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should be reprimanded.



Monday, 13 May 2013
  • Application 11020-2012
  • Admitted 2002
  • Hearing 13 December 2012
  • Reasons 15 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for an indefinite period to commence on 13 December 2012.



Monday, 13 May 2013
  • Application 10913-2012
  • Admitted 2004
  • Hearing 13 December 2012
  • Reasons 4 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.



Monday, 13 May 2013
  • Application 11008-2012
  • Hearing 8 January 2013
  • Reasons 4 February 2013

The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1973) should pay a fine of £4,000; that the second respondent (admitted 1979) should pay a fine of £2,000; and that the third respondent (admitted 1978) should pay a fine of £2,000.



Monday, 6 May 2013
  • Application 11000-2012
  • Hearing 11 December 2012
  • Reasons 23 January 2013


Monday, 6 May 2013
  • Application 11044-2012
  • Admitted 2005
  • Hearing 11 December 2012
  • Reasons 21 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.



Monday, 6 May 2013
  • Application 10948-2012
  • Admitted 1971
  • Hearing 6 December 2012
  • Reasons 4 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.



Monday, 6 May 2013
  • Application 10987-2012
  • Hearing 10 December 2012
  • Reasons 15 January 2013


Monday, 6 May 2013
  • Application 11005-2012
  • Admitted 1991
  • Hearing 12 December 2012
  • Reasons 10 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should be reprimanded.



Monday, 6 May 2013
  • Application 10905-2011
  • Admitted 2005
  • Hearing 14 June, 23 October and 11 December 2012
  • Reasons 8 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should pay a fine of £15,000.



Monday, 29 April 2013
  • Application 11001-2012
  • Hearing 15 November 2012
  • Reasons 21 December 2012

The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 2000) should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for six months to commence on 15 November 2012.



Monday, 29 April 2013
  • Application 10917-2012
  • Hearings 17-19 October
  • 12 November 2012
  • Reasons 7 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the first respondent should pay a fine of £50,000; that the second respondent (admitted 1988) should pay a fine of £20,000; that the third respondent (admitted 1970) should pay a fine of £5,000; and that the fourth respondent (admitted 1994) should pay a fine of £5,000.



Monday, 29 April 2013
  • Application 11006-2012
  • Admitted 2009
  • Hearing 27 November 2012
  • Reasons 8 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for six months to commence on 27 November 2012.



Monday, 29 April 2013
  • Application 10990-2012
  • Hearing 5 December 2012
  • Reasons 15 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1981) should pay a fine of £5,000; and that the second respondent (admitted 1963) should pay a fine of £2,000.



Monday, 29 April 2013
  • Application 11004-2012
  • Admitted 1991
  • Hearing 29 November 2012
  • Reasons 4 January 2013

The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.



Monday, 8 April 2013
  • Application 10827-2011
  • Admitted 1998
  • Hearing 28 September 2012
  • Reasons 15 November 2012

The SDT ordered that the respondent should pay a fine of £2,000.



Monday, 8 April 2013
  • Application 10998-2012
  • Hearing 19 November 2012
  • Reasons 20 December 2012

The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1982) should be struck off the roll.



Monday, 8 April 2013
  • Application 10989-2012
  • Hearing 8 November 2012
  • Reasons 14 December 2012

The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1983) should pay a fine of £3,000.



Wednesday, 27 March 2013
  • Application 10947-2012
  • Hearing 11 October 2012
  • Reasons 14 November 2012

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal ordered that the respondent, a registered foreign lawyer, should be struck off the Register of Foreign Lawyers.



Wednesday, 27 March 2013
  • Application 10799-2011
  • Admitted 1978
  • Hearing 16 October 2012
  • Reasons 17 November 2012

The SDT ordered that the applicant’s application for restoration to the roll should be granted.



Monday, 18 March 2013
  • Application 10894-2011
  • Admitted 1982
  • Hearing 15 October 2012
  • Reasons 16 November 2012

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.



Monday, 18 March 2013
  • Application 10983-2012
  • Hearing 23 October 2012
  • Reasons 12 November 2012


Monday, 18 March 2013
  • Application 10870-2011
  • Hearing 3 October 2012
  • Reasons 7 November 2012

The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 2007) should pay a fine of £4,000, and that the second respondent, a recognised body, should pay a fine of £6,000.