Is the pope right to speak out about the Equality Bill?
You have to hand it to the Equality Bill – its detractors come from every walk of life.
At one end of the spectrum there’s the white working class British guy who thinks the bill is all about giving his job to women or black people. It’s typical of this benighted government, he rages, and nothing, but nothing will persuade him to vote ‘Nu-Labour’ again!
And at the other end of the spectrum there’s a German guy, living in some splendour in Italy, who also dislikes our home-grown British bill and who also isn’t about to engage in reasoned debate – because, God knows, he’s never wrong.
He’s Pope Benedict XVI and, like his predecessors since the sixth century, he is infallible on points of doctrine concerning faith and morals – according to the Catholic church.
So what’s his beef about the 600-page Equality Bill? It limits the freedom of religious communities to ‘act in accordance with their beliefs’, he says, and ‘violates natural law’. He urges Britain’s Catholic bishops to fight the legislation with ‘missionary zeal’.
By ‘natural law’ he appears to mean the right to discriminate against people on the grounds of some or all of the nine ‘protected characteristics’ contained in the bill. These are: age; disability; gender reassignment; marriage and civil partnership; pregnancy and maternity; race; religion and belief (including lack of belief); sex; and sexual orientation.
Actually, the pope shouldn’t worry too much: discrimination legislation has never fully applied to religious groups anyway. Nobody has hauled the Catholic church to a tribunal to defend why women or married men can’t join the priesthood, for example. The new bill will similarly steer clear of preachers. It doesn’t propose making it illegal for a mosque to turn away, on the grounds of religion, a practising Buddhist who fancied a job as an imam, for instance; that would be plain silly.
But churches, mosques, synagogues and temples also employ secular people, for gardening, secretarial, maintenance and other jobs. And those employees will have the full protection of the law once the bill is enacted. Any religious group that turns down a gay person for a secular job simply because he or she is gay will be treated the same as any other erring employer. The same applies to the other protected characteristics: race, sex, disability and the rest.
That’s going to be the law of this country – as set down by our elected representatives in parliament. What right does the pope have to urge the Catholic bishops of Britain to fight it with ‘missionary zeal’?
Should he get involved in politics at all? Yes, because he’s the spiritual leader of the world’s Catholics and, as such, they look to him for leadership and advice. People of faith would argue that their faith and their lives, which of course are shaped by politics, are indivisible.
And our Human Rights Act, which also has detractors from all walks of life, allows him the same right to freedom of expression as everyone else in our diverse society. But that’s another legal can of worms altogether.


Comments
Lack of Dignity
Your description of Pope Benedict as someone who *also isn’t about to engage in reasoned debate – because, God knows, he’s never wrong* would be better edited out. It adds nothing to the substance of your argument. Indeed, you conclude correctly that he is entitled to comment. He is after all ultimately responsible for a large number of employees within the jursidiction.
The principle of infallibility, to which I presume you intend to refer, has rather limited theological applications. There is a great deal of very deeply considered wisdom in every comment he publishes and it seems that the government may have taken his concerns on board.
Your point that the Pope has
Your point that the Pope has been infallible since the sixth century is debatable as the concept of infallibility was only codified 150 years ago. And, since then, popes have only made two infallible statements, both concerning the doctrine of the Virgin Mary. So your comment that "he’s never wrong" is not true. Well, it's not true for Catholics anyway.
Catholic Church and Discrimnation Laws
If the Catholic Church thinks that it should not have to abide by the new discrimination laws, how would it feel if people stopped employing Catholics because of their beliefs and "lifestyle", same thing.
Melbourne Australia
Bavarian academic meets cretin culture
First, to correct an error of fact: the papacy pre-dates the sixth century. I think even Ian Paisley would grant that. As for the Pope not engaging in reasoned debate: try reading his Regensberg address from 2006, or one of his encyclicals, or his written exchanges with Jacob Neusner on the identity of Jesus. Perhaps his approach to "reasoned debate" is a little too dry and academic for a culture which prefers celebrity gossip and 140-character instatwittery...
The Pope and the Equality Bill
What is the point of this article?
I think Jonathan Rayner is merely trying to be inflammatory.
Hardly Surprising
All religions, as with all forms of moral philosophy, are fundamentally predicated on the grounds that they are in the right. The concept of equality for all is as alien to some people, as the concept that inequality might be justifiable to others.
The point of Mr. Rayner's article rests in the title. Some advocates for Equality have questioned the right of the Pope to interfere in domestic law-making. In so doing, they prove themselves to be as indoctrinated in their own mores as the most fundamental religious zealot, and fail to recognise another important Human Right...that to free speech.
Insert obvious Voltaire quote here...
Stupid and simple article.
Stupid and simple article.
Post new comment